Does this log show incorrect settings or implementation?

Noob question. Any help will be appreciated! https://tricorder.pi-hole.net/ftgioy2qkp

*** [ DIAGNOSING ]: Name resolution (IPv4) using a random blocked domain and a known ad-serving domain
[✓] zookeeper01.aatkit.com is 0.0.0.0 via localhost (127.0.0.1)
[✗] Failed to resolve zookeeper01.aatkit.com via Pi-hole (192.168.1.107)
[✓] doubleclick.com is 172.217.9.142 via a remote, public DNS server (8.8.8.8)
*** [ DIAGNOSING ]: Networking
[✓] IPv4 address(es) bound to the eth0 interface:
   192.168.65.1/24 does not match the IP found in /etc/pihole/setupVars.conf (https://discourse.pi-hole.net/t/use-ipv6-ula-addresses-for-pi-hole/2127)
   192.168.1.2/24 does not match the IP found in /etc/pihole/setupVars.conf (https://discourse.pi-hole.net/t/use-ipv6-ula-addresses-for-pi-hole/2127)

Thanks. New logfie https://tricorder.pi-hole.net/4su0aj4j5t
New log has

*** [ DIAGNOSING ]: Name resolution (IPv4) using a random blocked domain and a known ad-serving domain
[✓] elegantcerarnic.com is 0.0.0.0 via localhost (127.0.0.1)
[✓] elegantcerarnic.com is 0.0.0.0 via Pi-hole (192.168.1.2)
[✓] doubleclick.com is 172.217.9.142 via a remote, public DNS server (8.8.8.8)

and

*** [ DIAGNOSING ]: Networking
[✓] IPv4 address(es) bound to the eth0 interface:
192.168.65.1/24 does not match the IP found in /etc/pihole/setupVars.conf (Use IPv6 ULA addresses for Pi-hole)
192.168.1.2/24 matches the IP found in /etc/pihole/setupVars.conf

Is this good enough? Any other suggestions? Thanks!!!

Good enough? I don't know, does it work?

Thanks. I guess... Not sure what I'm looking at yet. Only showing 3 clients our of 28 connected devices. I may be able to tell more after another reboot of Firewalla. Maybe that will get rid of the
"192.168.65.1/24 does not match the IP found in /etc/pihole/setupVars.conf (Use IPv6 ULA addresses for Pi-hole)"?

I probably won't do that until late tonight or early tomorrow morning. I've already got everybody pissed at me here from losing their connections...