Right now it appears they all scale together. As it stands, I have one large line in top clients and every other line is very small in comparison. It would be nice if each category would scale independently.
Can you give an example of what you expect? The charts are displaying exactly what's happening, so maybe the bigger problem is that you have one very active client querying many domains?
See the top left group of Domains. I'd expect the top one, spectrum.s3.amazonaws.com to be a full bar across the top, then all others under it would have a bar length relative to the top line (progressively getting smaller). As it is, all of them are tiny and not visually useful.
The bottom left listing (top clients), it seems to me "mike_pc" should extend as much as possible. As you can see, it is only using half of the available space, which would give much better resolution to the clients under it.
Same concept with the group in the upper right.
My guess is they are all scaling relative to "mike_pc" at 20468, then basing the other bar length's off that. Each group should have it's own top value to scale off of.
They scale correctly. Here you can see the top clients list is based off of the total dns queries (shown at the top of the page):
https://github.com/pi-hole/AdminLTE/blob/e48aa295bd993a4a82bdabeb12a73e3123fc1559/scripts/pi-hole/js/index.js#L449
And here the top blocked and top domains, it is also scaled by the total dns queries:
https://github.com/pi-hole/AdminLTE/blob/master/scripts/pi-hole/js/index.js#L487
If they scaled based on only the top 10 (what you see) then their stats would be almost worthless, because the rest of the group not in the top 10 are completely disregarded.
I see what you are saying. What this tells me, I think, is that I seem to have a large number of different domains that are visited and getting blocked. No one site stands out above the rest and they all have roughly similar chart lengths. Thanks for the explanation.
1 Like