Expected behaviour:
Recently I upgraded my Linksys Velop mesh-network to TP-Link X60. I also installed a fresh install of pihole on my raspberry pi, hoping everything would have worked like before!
After installation I noticed some different behaviours I will state below. I see myself as a person who likes to thinker with stuff but my technical skills are limited compared to what I see written here by other users. Hopefully someone can enlighten me to what might cause that adblocking via pihole seems to be a bit of a hit and miss.
Actual Behaviour and what I tested
- Compared to the Linksys Velop and pihole combination, where I would only see pi.hole and localhost listed in the cliëntlist, with the new TP-link router and nodes I see a list of what seems to be all the cliënt's in my network. I consider this a good thing :);
- I tested to see if a cliënt is using the pihole by
nslookup pi.hole
this results in
Server: 2001:b88:1002::10
Address: 2001:b88:1002::10#53
server can't find pi.hole: NXDOMAIN
(this could be due to ipv4 vs ipv6 see my thoughts below);
- I noticed that all my Apple cliënt's were using the setting Private Wi-Fi address again, could be because the new network uses WPA2/WPA3 personal and it defaulted back to Private Wi-Fi address; Changing this off again didn't change a thing;
- I tested Test Ad Block - Toolz with safari add-on blockers (I use for remote work) switched off and nothing seems to be blocked by the pihole.
My thoughts and questions:
- I noted that all my cliënt's have an ipv4 ip but also an ipv6 ip, might that cause that ipv6 traffic is bypassing the pihole because I haven't added the pihole's ipv6 address to my router settings as DNS secondary?;
- Would turning off ipv6 DHCP setting be a good way of testing this or am I breaking things that way?