# Is this a solution for running a DoH server in front of Pi-hole?

**URL:** <https://discourse.pi-hole.net/t/is-this-a-solution-for-running-a-doh-server-in-front-of-pi-hole/38446>\
**Category:** Community Help\
**Created:** [September 17, 2020, 7:51pm UTC](https://discourse.pi-hole.net/t/is-this-a-solution-for-running-a-doh-server-in-front-of-pi-hole/38446 "2020-09-17T19:51:17Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ChurchOfNoise](https://discourse-cdn.pi-hole.net/user_avatar/discourse.pi-hole.net/churchofnoise/32/17886_2.png) [@ChurchOfNoise](https://discourse.pi-hole.net/u/ChurchOfNoise)\
**Post date:** [September 19, 2020, 9:56am UTC](https://discourse.pi-hole.net/t/is-this-a-solution-for-running-a-doh-server-in-front-of-pi-hole/38446/10 "2020-09-19T09:56:20Z")

</div>

> [@Bucking\_Horn](#):
>
> As both browsers do fall back to plain DNS anyway, there would be no point in supporting DoH on Pi-hole, would there?

Agreed, I thought we could have Firefox, Chrome or whatever see Pi-Hole as a DoH provider but clearly they won't. Thanks for taking the time to clarify!

(I still share the concerns as voiced in [this topic](https://discourse.pi-hole.net/t/dns-encryption-and-the-future-of-pihole/27153)...)

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.pi-hole.net/t/is-this-a-solution-for-running-a-doh-server-in-front-of-pi-hole/38446)._