# Does this log show incorrect settings or implementation?

**URL:** <https://discourse.pi-hole.net/t/does-this-log-show-incorrect-settings-or-implementation/34710>\
**Category:** General\
**Created:** [June 21, 2020, 4:07pm UTC](https://discourse.pi-hole.net/t/does-this-log-show-incorrect-settings-or-implementation/34710 "2020-06-21T16:07:51Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nozero](https://discourse-cdn.pi-hole.net/user_avatar/discourse.pi-hole.net/nozero/32/16731_2.png) [@nozero](https://discourse.pi-hole.net/u/nozero)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2020, 6:49pm UTC](https://discourse.pi-hole.net/t/does-this-log-show-incorrect-settings-or-implementation/34710/3 "2020-06-21T18:49:18Z")

</div>

Thanks. New logfie [https://tricorder.pi-hole.net/4su0aj4j5t](https://tricorder.pi-hole.net/4su0aj4j5t)  
New log has

\*\*\* [DIAGNOSING]: Name resolution (IPv4) using a random blocked domain and a known ad-serving domain  
[✓] elegantcerarnic.com is 0.0.0.0 via localhost (127.0.0.1)  
[✓] elegantcerarnic.com is 0.0.0.0 via Pi-hole (192.168.1.2)  
[✓] doubleclick.com is 172.217.9.142 via a remote, public DNS server (8.8.8.8)

and

\*\*\* [DIAGNOSING]: Networking  
[✓] IPv4 address(es) bound to the eth0 interface:  
192.168.65.1/24 does not match the IP found in /etc/pihole/setupVars.conf ([Use IPv6 ULA addresses for Pi-hole](https://discourse.pi-hole.net/t/use-ipv6-ula-addresses-for-pi-hole/2127))  
192.168.1.2/24 matches the IP found in /etc/pihole/setupVars.conf

Is this good enough? Any other suggestions? Thanks!!!

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.pi-hole.net/t/does-this-log-show-incorrect-settings-or-implementation/34710)._